sorry, sent private response only to Marq, to the effect that I was trying to clarify the implications, not complaining about them. you would have to coerce to contribute.. if your test bench needs to do it, "casting" would be the wrong thing to do anyway.. Casting gives you the flexibility to access it either as analog or logical in different places in the same module.. Jonathan Jonathan David j.david_ f rom _ieee.org jb_david_ f rom _yahoo.com http://ieee-jbdavid.blogspot.com Mobile 408 390 2425 Work: jbdavid_ f rom _scintera.com http://www.scintera.com 408 200-7024 ----- Original Message ---- From: Marq Kole <marq.kole_ f rom _nxp.com> To: verilog-ams <verilog-ams_ f rom _eda-stds.org> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2006 12:26:09 AM Subject: Re: Hierarchical reference questions Jonathan, Yeah, but for contribution you probably want the contributing OOMR signal to be part of the discipline resolution for the whole design, while for RHS that is not really needed. To put it in another way: for contribution you actually want the behavior of the design to change, while for reading/probing (again considering the test bench use) you do not want a different behavior because of the reading/probing. Cheers, Marq Marq Kole Competence Leader Robust Design Research NXP Semiconductors Jonathan David <jb_david_ f rom _yahoo.com> 08-12-2006 08:08 To Marq Kole <marq.kole_ f rom _nxp.com> verilog-ams <verilog-ams_ f rom _eda-stds.org> cc Subject Re: Hierarchical reference questions Classification One implication of this is that its ONLY for RHS expressions.. you'd have to Coerce to do a heirarchical contribution. But it does seem more flexible Jonathan David j.david_ f rom _ieee.org jb_david_ f rom _yahoo.com http://ieee-jbdavid.blogspot.com Mobile 408 390 2425 Work: jbdavid_ f rom _scintera.com http://www.scintera.com 408 200-7024 ----- Original Message ---- From: Marq Kole <marq.kole_ f rom _nxp.com> To: verilog-ams <verilog-ams_ f rom _eda-stds.org> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2006 10:37:55 PM Subject: RE: Hierarchical reference questions Martin, Instead of the proposed "useas" keyword would you suggest that we can also fit the casting operation to our needs? So for Graham's example: myDesign system(.....); //electrical system.inst.inst.net; // not needed //logic system.inst.net; // not needed analog $display("Value is %g.", V(electrical'(system.inst.inst.net))); initial $display("Value is %b.", logic'(system.inst.net)); As a way to handle OOMR I like this better than the "useas" keyword. Cheers, Marq Marq Kole Competence Leader Robust Design Research NXP Semiconductors "Martin O'Leary" <oleary_ f rom _cadence.com> Sent by: owner-verilog-ams_ f rom _server.eda.org 08-12-2006 07:06 To "Jonathan David" <jb_david_ f rom _yahoo.com> "Graham Helwig" <graham.helwig_ f rom _astc-design.com> "Verilog-AMS Reflector" <verilog-ams_ f rom _server.eda.org> cc Subject RE: Hierarchical reference questions Classification FYI Here is something from section 4.14 "Casting" of SystemVerilog that talks about how casting is done in that language. > A data type can be changed by using a cast ( ' ) operation. In a static cast, the expression to be cast > shall be enclosed in parentheses that are prefixed with the casting type and an apostrophe. If the > expression is assignment > compatible with the casting type, then the cast shall return the value that a variable of the casting > type would hold after being assigned the expression. If the expression is not assignment compatible > with the casting type, then if the casting type is an enumerated type, the behavior shall be as > described as in 4.15, and if the casting type is a bit-stream type, the behavior shall be as > described in 4.16. Here is an example of how a real expression is cast to an int. > int'(2.0 * 3.0) Thanks, --Martin -----Original Message----- From: owner-verilog-ams_ f rom _eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams_ f rom _eda.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan David Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 9:55 PM To: Graham Helwig; Verilog-AMS Reflector Subject: Re: Hierarchical reference questions I'll propose that we add a keyword "useas" useas ''discipline_name'' hier.net.reference.to.net; with the "useas" declaration, the net would not Actually be coerced to this discipline, we'd get an interface element instead.. One idea from tonights meeting. Jonathan David j.david_ f rom _ieee.org jb_david_ f rom _yahoo.com http://ieee-jbdavid.blogspot.com Mobile 408 390 2425 Work: jbdavid_ f rom _scintera.com http://www.scintera.com 408 200-7024 ----- Original Message ---- From: Graham Helwig <graham.helwig_ f rom _astc-design.com> To: Verilog-AMS Reflector <verilog-ams_ f rom _eda.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2006 11:46:38 PM Subject: Hierarchical reference questions Hello, When simulating large mixed-signal design (containing transistors and gates) I have had the need to hierarchically reference an implicit net with the design. Also the resolved domain of the net is not known and even if it is known it may change from one simulation to the next. I may of missed in the LRM, but is hierarchical referencing of an implicit nets allowed in the language? If it is, then does the net need to be coerced to the same domain as the probe or does discipline resolution and ACMI resolves handle the resolution of the implicit net including any hierarchical references to that net? For example: myDesign system(.....); electrical system.inst.inst.net; // is this required? logic system.inst.net; // is this required? analog $display("Value is %g.", V(system.inst.inst.net)); initial $display("Value is %b.", system.inst.net); Regards Graham -- ========================================================== Graham Helwig AMS Verification Australian Semiconductor Technology Company (ASTC) Pty Ltd Location: 76 Waymouth St, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia Phone +61-8-82312782 Moblie: +61-4-03395909 Email: graham.helwig_ f rom _astc-design.com Web: www.astc-design.com ==========================================================Received on Fri Dec 8 00:45:42 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 08 2006 - 00:45:44 PST