Re: disallow distributed switch branches

Kevin -
No, I'm not confusing the issues.

This code:

   module A ...
       electrical a,b;
       analog  begin
               V(a,b) <+ 5;
               V(a,b) <+ 6;
       end
   endmodule

works presently in AMS, and gives 11.  If you split them into
separate modules, then it fails because they're in parallel.

I think that your first module, with
       analog  V(a,b) <+ 5;
       analog  V(a,b) <+ 6;
is "more like" my module above, hence, I think that the
behavior of multiple analog blocks should be "more like"
multiple contribs in one block (rather than multiple
instances).

-Geoffrey




Kevin Cameron wrote:
> 
> You are confusing the issues. The problem is if you have
> 
>    module A ...
>        electrical a,b;
>        analog  V(a,b) <+ 5;
>        analog  V(a,b) <+ 6;
>    endmodule
> 
> Which would work under Marq's proposed rules giving V(a,b) == 11, but if you split it into submodules:
> 
>    module A ...
>        electrical a,b;
>        B;
>        C;
>   endmodule
> 
>   module B..
>        analog  V(A.a,A.b) <+ 5;
>   endmodule
>   module C
>        analog  V(A.a,A.b) <+ 6;
>   endmodule
> 
> That fails because the contributions are now considered as being in parallel.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.