Re: real-to-integer conversion

From: Geoffrey.Coram <geoffrey.coram_at_.....>
Date: Tue Oct 16 2007 - 06:41:00 PDT
4.1.1.1 is where it was originally in AMS LRM 2.2.

In 1364-2005, Section 3 (Lexical conventions) has 3.5.3 Conversion,
and also Section 4 (Data types) has 4.8.2 Conversion.

-Geoffrey


Marq Kole wrote:
> All,
> 
> And the same text is also present in subsection 4.1.1.1 - do we really 
> need to hammer this home? :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Marq
> 
> owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org wrote on 16-10-2007 15:14:14:
>  > All,
>  >
>  > The current Verilog-AMS update proposals for chapter 2 and chapter 3
>  > contain duplictae information: the first paragraph of section 3.1.1
>  > is essentially the same as section 2.5.4. Considering that
>  > conversion is not a lexical convention I would suggest to remove it
>  > from section 2.5.4 and provide the additional examples of conversion
>  > in this subsection to section 3.1.1.
>  >
>  > Cheers,
>  > Marq

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Oct 16 06:41:22 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 16 2007 - 06:41:24 PDT