Re: $finish and final_step

From: Jonathan David <jb_david_at_.....>
Date: Thu Mar 27 2008 - 12:19:28 PDT
If we don't trigger the final_steps, 
all the tasks that dump our data from our analog blocks and close the files will not run.. 
which, as a verifier would be a REALLY BAD THING not to be able to do..
as the final_step is where we know the end state of the sim, and if the sim is successful or not. 
-- so if it not successful, its probably ok to do that.. 
but I'd ALSO want a task that really does do the final steps, and then exit the sim.. 
maybe call it $final_finish
which would collapse to $finish in the case of a digitial only simulation.
Jonathan
 
Jonathan David
j.david@ieee.org
jb_david@yahoo.com
http://ieee-jbdavid.blogspot.com
Mobile 408 390 2425

----- Original Message ----
From: Neugebauer Kurt <Kurt.Neugebauer@freescale.com>
To: Martin O'Leary <oleary@cadence.com>; Miller Dave <david.l.miller@freescale.com>; Xavier Bestel <Xavier_Bestel@mentor.com>
Cc: Verilog-AMS LRM Committee <verilog-ams@eda.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 1:44:56 AM
Subject: RE: $finish and final_step

Hi,

Martin is right, the question is what Design/verification wants here.
$finish; in digital is used for end of verification (all tests complete)
or in by event triggered subroutine (i.e. test failure). There is no
need for analog @final_step block to trigger a final digital
event/subroutine, because the digital engine (event triggered) is always
in the state wanted.
Digital $finish triggering analog final_step: I'm not sure, but do we
need it to i.e. close open output files, do post processing steps in the
analog solver (analog assertions), ... ?

Kurt Neugebauer 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org] On
Behalf Of Martin O'Leary
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:37 AM
To: Miller Dave; Xavier Bestel
Cc: Verilog-AMS LRM Committee
Subject: RE: $finish and final_step

David, Xavier
I don't think it is such a straight-forward thing to say. The answer
below seems to only cover $finish executed in an analog block.

In digital, a $finish immediately terminates the simulation. For AMS, it
doesn't make sense to me that we require digital to then execute the
analog solver to do another time step in order to execute the
@final_step blocks after a $finish is encountered when normally a
digital simulators terminate immediately when a $finish occurs.

Also LRM2.2 says that $finish "simply makes the simulator exit" so this
would seem to not be a backwardly compatible change.

Thanks,
--Martin 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-verilog-ams@eda.org [mailto:owner-verilog-ams@eda.org] On
Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 8:35 AM
To: Xavier Bestel
Cc: Verilog-AMS LRM Committee
Subject: Re: $finish and final_step

Hello Xavier,

yes, $finish should cleanly stop the simulation by converging on this
timestep and executing any final_step blocks.

$stop should converge on the current timestep but not execute final_step
blocks.

Main difference between $finish and $stop is that $stop is more like a
pause - the simulation can be resumed. $finish terminates the
simulation.

I am not sure why this is not highlighted in the LRM - I know that we
discuss the simulation control tasks but seems that adding in this
behaviour explicitly was missed. I will make a note to get it added into
next draft of 2.3


Cheers...
Dave


Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> should $finish execute the step again with final_step events on ?
> I didn't see it specified in the LRM, in a way or in the other.
> 
> Thanks,
>     Xav
> 
> 

--
=====================================
-- David Miller
-- Design Technology (Austin)
-- Freescale Semiconductor
-- Ph : 512 996-7377 Fax: x7755
=====================================

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.






-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Mar 27 12:24:09 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 27 2008 - 12:24:25 PDT