Re: Verilog-AMS committee meeting reminder - 3rd April 2008

From: Kevin Cameron <Kevin.Cameron_at_.....>
Date: Wed Apr 02 2008 - 14:34:31 PDT
David Miller wrote:
>> I didn't get any feedback on on the connect module placement issue -
>>
>>    http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=2343
>>
>> Does anyone have problems with making the changes?
> Hello Kevin,
> I am trying to get an understanding of this proposal. Consider a 
> simple module setup:
>
> module parent();
>   electrical a;
>   electrical gnd;
>   ground gnd;
>   wire net;
>
>   vdc #(.dc(5)) v0(a,gnd);
>   mydig d1(a,net);
> endmodule
>
> module mydig(in,out);
>   wire in; input in;
>   wire out; output out;
>   assign out = in;
> endmodule
>
>
> Currently the connect module (a2d) to convert the electrical net 'a' 
> to digital  'in' is inserted in parent.
> Are you proposing that it is inserted in mydig instead?

Yes, since the "assign" statement is the actual driving process.

Kev.

-- 
True Circuits Inc. - http://www.truecircuits.com
Tel: (650) 949 3400 Ext 3415


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Apr 2 14:35:13 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 02 2008 - 14:35:18 PDT