Re: Verilog-AMS committee meeting reminder - 3rd April 2008

Hi Kevin,

I currently cannot oversee all implications of this attribution of connect
modules. In my limited view I think a better description of what happens
for all connect module resolutions is needed: merged vs. split, and regular
vs. detailed resolution. A change in connect rules could very well imply
that the hierarchical references to the connect module instances change. I
would suggest that hierarchical references to connect rules be invariant to
these rules as much as possible.

Just my $0.02...

Perhaps we can take this up in the mixed-signal subcommittee?

Cheers,
Marq

owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org wrote on 02-04-2008 20:48:00:

> Sri Chandra wrote:
> > 06:30am US Pacific
> > ...
> Not going to make that.
> >
> > Agenda:
> > * Review of draft3 from chapter 5 onwards.
>
> I didn't get any feedback on on the connect module placement issue -
>
>     http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=2343
>
> Does anyone have problems with making the changes?
>
> Kev.
>
> >
> > Marq - Would it be possible for you to chair the call tomorrow please?
> > I  may not be able to join the call.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Sri
>
>
> --
> True Circuits Inc. - http://www.truecircuits.com
> Tel: (650) 949 3400 Ext 3415
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.