Re: LRM 2.3.1 Draft C posted

Do we need a new section in Annex G, on the changes from previous LRMs?

-Geoffrey



David Miller wrote:
> http://www.eda-stds.org/verilog-ams/htmlpages/public-docs/v2.3.1_drafts/VAMS-LRM-2-3-1-Draft-C.pdf 
> 
> 
> The following was addressed:
> 
>> #2581 - 3.12 - Last sentence in paragraph 3 should read:
>>
>> There shall be at most one unnamed branch between any two nets or 
>> between a net
>> and implicit ground (in addition to any number of named branches).
>>
>> * 5.4.1 - Example 2 sub point 1. Last sentence should read:
>>
>> There can only be one unnamed branch between any two nets or between a 
>> net and
>> implicit ground (in addition to any number of named branches).
>>
>> #2266 - D.1 - for the signal flow current it should be current Current 
>> not
>> potential Current.
>>
>> # MISC - at the start of the grammar, add the sentence:
>> The following grammar is designed as a presentation grammar and should 
>> not be
>> interpreted as an unambiguous production grammar. The compiler 
>> developer will be
>> required to implement the various semantic restrictions outlined 
>> through out
>> this reference manual to remove any ambiguities.
>>
>> # 2537 - Sub issue 7 - 6.4(.1)/A.1.9 - the 
>> .module_parameter_identifier and
>> .system_parameter_identifier should be assigned a 
>> paramset_constant_expression.
>> A paramset_constant_expression is a constant_expression minus the 
>> reference to
>> parameters. The production should look like:
>>
>> paramset_constant_expression ::=     constant_expression
>>   | hierarchical_parameter_identifier
>>
>>
>> In 6.4.1 - the sentence should read:
>> The expression on the right-hand side can be composed of numbers , 
>> parameters
>> and hierarchical out-of-module references to local parameters of a 
>> different
>> module. Hierarchical out-of-module references to non-local parameters 
>> of a
>> different module is disallowed.
>>
>> Also declare electrical gnd and replace reference to 0 with gnd in 
>> example
>> 6.4.1
> 
> Issue 2497 /#13 analysis() function still needs to be addressed and I 
> hope to have that done before the call tomorrow.
> 
> Dave
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.