Hello Paul, Yes, sorry. I saw your original email and noted this down as part of the clean up items I am doing. I just forgot to send a response. Yes that bullet is confusing - all we really wanted to say was the UDF must have at least one formal argument. Your modification is a lot clearer - I will use that as the replacement. Regards Dave Paul Floyd wrote: > Hi > > I sent this a while back, but never received it from the listserver. > > The LRM 2.3.1 has this to say about UDFs. > > An analog user defined function: > ... > — shall have at least one input declared; the block item declaration > shall declare the type of the inputs > (whether they are input, output, inout) > > This doesn't seem to be clear English to me, implying that an UDF can > have an "input" that is an "output". Unless I've misunderstood, wouldn't > > — shall have at least one formal argument declared; the block item > declaration shall declare the type of the formal arguments > (whether they are input, output, inout). > > be clearer? (Assuming that "formal argument" doesn't need defining). > > Regards > Paul Floyd -- ============================================== -- It's a beautiful day -- Don't let it get away -- -- David Miller -- Design Technology (Austin) -- Freescale Semiconductor -- Ph : 512 996-7377 Fax: x7755 ============================================== -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Nov 10 06:31:44 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 10 2009 - 06:32:01 PST