to VPI or not ?

Subject: to VPI or not ?
From: Bassam Tabbara (bassam@novas.com)
Date: Thu Oct 03 2002 - 15:17:43 PDT

• Next message: Kevin Cameron x3251: "Re: SV APIs (Assertion)"
• Previous message: Stickley, John: "Re: SV APIs (Assertion)"
• In reply to: Stickley, John: "Re: SV APIs (Assertion)"
• Next in thread: Kevin Cameron x3251: "Re: SV APIs (Assertion)"
• Reply: Bassam Tabbara: "to VPI or not ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I keep seeing mention of VPI etc... over and over .... . I thought that's out of the todo, is it or NOT ? If it's out already why are we discussing the same thing over again ?

BTW, Can we update the webpage as well the "charter" vs. actual ? and "announce" this is postponed ?

Quoting from the minutes:
>
> Here are the minutes of the SV-CC meeting for 9/24/02
>
> Date : 9/24/02    Time: 9:00 am (PST)
[....]
> A final note on the full SV meeting. Since no proposal was received by
> the committee
> by the Sept. 15th deadline, we will not be working on the VPI
> enhancements.
 

-- 
Dr. Bassam Tabbara
Technical Manager, R&D

Novas Software, Inc.
bassam@novas.com
(408) 467-7893

• Next message: Kevin Cameron x3251: "Re: SV APIs (Assertion)"
• Previous message: Stickley, John: "Re: SV APIs (Assertion)"
• In reply to: Stickley, John: "Re: SV APIs (Assertion)"
• Next in thread: Kevin Cameron x3251: "Re: SV APIs (Assertion)"
• Reply: Bassam Tabbara: "to VPI or not ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Oct 03 2002 - 15:18:25 PDT