Subject: FW: Re: Website updated
From: Vassilios.Gerousis@Infineon.Com
Date: Mon Oct 07 2002 - 20:55:25 PDT
Forwarded email.
-----Original Message-----
Subject: BOUNCE sv-cc@eda.org: Admin request of type /^\s*which\s*$/i at
line 9
X-Sender: fm@otis.cadence.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 11:54:50 -0400
To: trivedi@pacbell.net, sv-cc@server.eda.org
From: Francoise Martinolle <fm@cadence.com>
Subject: Re: Website updated
In-Reply-To: <3DA134EA.4020407@pacbell.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Received: By mailgate.Cadence.COM as IAA18631 at Mon Oct 7 08:54:52 2002
Yatin,
My schedule only allows for the meeting to start earlier and not end later.
I have another meeting at 1:30 that I have to prepare for.
Could we start at 11 am or 11:30 and have 1hour and a half of discussion?
Are we continuing to meet weekly or every 2 weeks? 2 hours every week seem
a lot especially if we are also attending the other systemVerilog meetings
which
happen every 2 weeks.
If people prepare for the meeting then the discussion can go faster and we
can make
decisions. Sometimes having longer meeting can drag discussion. I think the
best is
to have weekly meetings which can stir email discussion and keep the
pressure on.
I would rather have 1 hour weekly, and allow to sometimes go over when
needed to.
Francoise
'
At 12:16 AM 10/7/2002 -0700, Yatin Trivedi wrote:
>SV-CC web site has been updated with latest member list
>and last minutes.
>
>I would also like to find out if anyone has an objection
>to increase the meeting time from 1 hour to 2 hours.
>
>Now that we have the basic donation acceptance, I'd
>like to collect all the known questions to debate and
>resolve at or prior to the meeting. If we do well with
>our email communication, the meeting time can be short.
>Please send me your opinion.
>
>Yatin
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 20:59:24 PDT