Issue 1.5: DirectC:Should use a common and unique prefix for all

Subject: Issue 1.5: DirectC:Should use a common and unique prefix for all
From: Francoise Martinolle (fm@cadence.com)
Date: Tue Nov 05 2002 - 07:48:24 PST

• Next message: Michael Rohleder: "ISSUE:DirectC:Abstract Access Method requires rewrite of code"
• Previous message: Francoise Martinolle: "issue 1.4: No clear relationship to other APIs"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

functions
To: sv-cc@eda.org, mittra@juno.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: IzpGq77Qr1MoGEzHs5Hgeg==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.3.5 SunOS 5.7 sun4u sparc

I agree that a common and unique prefix should be used for any directC API
service function, type or defined constant.

francoise
    '
    

• Next message: Michael Rohleder: "ISSUE:DirectC:Abstract Access Method requires rewrite of code"
• Previous message: Francoise Martinolle: "issue 1.4: No clear relationship to other APIs"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Nov 05 2002 - 07:48:47 PST