[sv-cc] Vote on Michael's Inclusion proposals

Subject: [sv-cc] Vote on Michael's Inclusion proposals
From: Warmke, Doug (doug_warmke@mentorg.com)
Date: Tue Feb 25 2003 - 23:36:38 PST

• Next message: Francoise Martinolle: "[sv-cc] RE: [sv-bc] function external declarations and prototypes"
• Previous message: Joao Geada: "[sv-cc] My vote on issue 1.9"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Swapnajit,

I vote yes on the object inclusion proposal.

I vote no on the source inclusion proposal.

As written, I think the proposal can work for many
simple cases. Similar to how DPI can work for many
simple cases, but certain C programming tasks will
always be in the realm of VPI.

However, Francoise's points about the simplicity
and portability of the shared object inclusion
method are good. I think going with only shared
object inclusion will make the overall inclusion
system more stable and intuitive for users.

I will be happy to reconsider this for SV 3.2.
Thanks for all the work on these proposals, Michael.
Sorry I couldn't go with you on the source inclusion.

Regards,
Doug

• Next message: Francoise Martinolle: "[sv-cc] RE: [sv-bc] function external declarations and prototypes"
• Previous message: Joao Geada: "[sv-cc] My vote on issue 1.9"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Feb 25 2003 - 23:37:13 PST