Subject: RE: [sv-cc] RE: Version 2 of DPI LRM - partial results of poll on names
From: Amouroux, John (john_amouroux@mentorg.com)
Date: Mon Mar 17 2003 - 14:38:22 PST
My informal poll response:
#4 below would be my first choice, but #3 would be my next, which seems to
be winning anyway.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrzej Litwiniuk [mailto:Andrzej.Litwiniuk@synopsys.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:28 PM
> To: fm@cadence.com
> Cc: sv-cc@server.eda.org
> Subject: [sv-cc] RE: Version 2 of DPI LRM - partial results of poll on
> names
>
> Team,
>
> Here are partial results of the poll on names of types and include files.
>
>
> > > > > svOpenArrayHandle
> > > > > svScopeHandle
> > > >
> > > > Fine with me.
> > >DOUG: Fine with me, too.
> > Francoise: good for me.
>
> I presume the above names have been accepted.
>
>
>
> > > > > 1) svc.h + svc_src.h
> > > > > 2) dpi.h + dpi_src.h
> > > > > 3) svdpi.h + svdpi_src.h
> > > > > 4) sv_dpi.h + sv_dpi_src.h
> > > > > 5) sv_dpi_c.h + sv_dpi_c_src.h
>
>
> > Francoise: I like 3)
> ) Bassam: 3) "How about svdpi_... ?"
> > DOUG: I like 2), 2nd choice would be 3).
> > JohnS: 3) "svdpi.h, svdpi_src.h"
> > Michael: I like 4) more [...] But all others are O.K. as well. Pick
> one.
> > Andrzej: I opt for 5)
>
> ... and the winner is "svdpi(_src).h".
> Anybody objects?
>
> If nobody protests, I'll ask Phil to put the new names into LRM.
>
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Andrzej
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Mar 17 2003 - 14:40:02 PST