Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Updated LRM
From: Warmke, Doug (doug_warmke@mentorg.com)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2003 - 09:16:58 PST
Andrzej,
The PDF that Joao sent out yesterday was missing all
of my edits. For example, I made many grammar and
terminology corrections, such as changing "DirectC"
to "Direct Programming Interface".
I'm looking forward to seeing the new version of the
LRM that contains my edits.
Thanks and regards,
Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrzej Litwiniuk [mailto:Andrzej.Litwiniuk@synopsys.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:04 AM
> To: Warmke, Doug
> Cc: Joao.Geada@synopsys.COM; sv-cc@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-cc] Updated LRM
>
>
> > Andrzej had requested that someone else handle inserting context
> > related text into the LRM. I took that action at our weekly
> > meeting two weeks ago. Last weekend I worked 20 hours to make LRM
> > edits, with change bars and the customary text
> highlighting. It was a
> > lot of work and I feel like I made a lot of improvements. I
> sent all
> > the changes to Andrzej in Frame format and I sent the PDF
> to committee
> > members in time for our meeting last week.
> >
> > At least three SV-CC members reviewed my "rev2" edits I
> > made and had constructive comments. I'm not really sure
> how you could
> > have missed all that(?)
>
> Doug,
>
> I don't think your revisions got missed or lost. All of them
> but the section
> "8. Context functions" are incorporated, along with my tiny
> additions and corrections in the Frame document passed to
> Phil & Joao. Specifically, I added two placeholders for
> context and user's data ("9.1.5 Access to context", "9.1.6
> Associating user's data with instances") to be filled by Joao.
>
>
> Section "8. Context functions" intact (as you wrote it) was
> passed to them separately. I presumed that Joao might want to
> sync-up and merge his work on
> extern/export/scope/user's data, etc. with your sub-chapter
> on context functions. (I'm talking about C layer only).
>
>
> Regards,
> Andrzej
>
> > Please make sure to work with Andrzej and Phil to get those
> edits into
> > the formal LRM. Actually I took the exact thing you sent
> out on the
> > reflector yesterday (rev1) and only added to it. More work
> is needed
> > based on discussion since then. I think you can use my
> versions of the
> > Frame as a starting point, since the only things I deleted/inserted
> > were agreed upon and requested by committee members. As I
> said, more
> > work is needed. But the rev2 versions are a lot closer to
> > the final product than the rev1 versions you published
> > yesterday.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Doug
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Mar 18 2003 - 09:17:45 PST