Re: [sv-cc] LRM modifications for svGet/PutUserData proposal


Subject: Re: [sv-cc] LRM modifications for svGet/PutUserData proposal
From: Andrzej Litwiniuk (Andrzej.Litwiniuk@synopsys.com)
Date: Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:30:42 PST


> Are all these scenarios desirable and likely valid?
> I think the difference between your proposal and Andrzej 's proposal is
> that Andrzej leaves it
> to the client application code to manage the association between an id
> returned by DPI
> and the imported function call instance. Your proposal forces the
> association to be kept
> by DPI, therefore all the various scenarios where you would want an id per
> funciton call,
> or an id per module instance or an id per module definition.
>
> Francoise

Greetings on behalf of E.W.Dijkstra! Software Engineering salutes you!
Separate concerns!

Andrzej :-)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Mar 26 2003 - 11:31:46 PST