Subject: [sv-cc] Cross-committee issues for 3.2 from SV-CC
From: Swapnajit Mittra (mittra@juno.com)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 00:50:51 PDT
Vassilios,
As you know, there were few cross-committee issues that
SV-CC came across during the preparation of 3.1 LRM.
While most of them were resolved, few of them need some
more discussion. I will take this opportunity to put them as
cross-committee items for SV 3.2. (If there are similar issues
with other committees that they want to resolve with SV-CC,
I would request them to prepare a similar list).
o SV-CC to SV-BC: Representation of SV data type
A proposal was prepared by SV-CC and was sent to SV-BC.
Unfortunately, the proposal closed without any feedback from
SV-BC after the stipulated timeframe passed. It is unclear what
happened to the proposal. SV-CC team strongly feels that this
should be brought up for discussion in a future SV-BC meeting
during 3.2 timeframe.
The original proposal can be found at:
http://www.eda.org/sv-cc/hm/1053.html
o SV-CC to SV-EC: Open vs Dynamic array
There were some discussions on using a consistent terminology
for 'open' and 'dynamic' array. While the outstanding issues related
to them within SV-CC were resolved, more discussions needed on
this between SV-CC and SV-EC.
o SV-CC to SV-EC/BC: Pragma vs attribute
A comment was made on Section 28.3.1, Draft 4 of the LRM regarding
whether attributes can be used in stead of pragmas. When pragmas are
used for SV 3.1, attributes may be considered for future version.
Note that,
- As always, this is a partial list as I am sure I might have missed
a few others. I will let you know if any other topic comes up.
- This list is only for cross-committee items for SV 3.2. A separate
list is under preparation for SV-CC's own issues (to be discussed
within the team).
I would request you to co-ordinate the activities related to the items
on this list. Please let me know if you have any question.
Regards,
- Swapnajit.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue May 06 2003 - 00:52:32 PDT