RE: [sv-cc] Meeting minutes, July 16, 2003

Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Meeting minutes, July 16, 2003
From: Swapnajit Mittra (mittra@juno.com)
Date: Wed Jul 16 2003 - 14:26:20 PDT

Doug,

Probably I am just repeating others, yes, your topic
was brought up during today's meeting. In your absence
we decided Andrzej would look into this.

(He has already sent you the technical part of this
discussed in the meeting).

We also decided to re-visit this next week.

Thanks for being careful. 

--
Swapnajit Mittra
Project VeriPage ::: http://www.angelfire.com/ca/verilog

--- "Warmke, Doug" <doug_warmke@mentorg.com> wrote:

Team,

Sorry I missed the meeting earlier today.
It just wasn't possible to get to a telephone
at the right time.

I'm curious why no mention was made of my email
on the BNF issue, nor my suggested changes in
the grammar.  I don't think the changes were quite 
ridiculous enough to deserve no discussion at all.
Even if they were, I'd like to hear the reasons -
then I would learn something important.

Thanks and regards,
Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: Francoise Martinolle
To: sv-cc@eda.org
Sent: 7/16/2003 9:32 AM
Subject: [sv-cc] Meeting minutes, July 16, 2003

Approval of minutes: Andrzej
Michael seconded

Attendees: Swapnajit, Michael, Joao Ghassan, Francoise

Swapnajit:
   role of the champion:
   Our champion (Joao) would be involved for any changes of the sv 3.1
LRM. 
He would take take part in any discussion affecting the 3.1 LRM. If 
anything needs to be changed, the champions would be looking at other 
committees sections and resolve the issue.
  The chair has to approve the change.

How erratas will be done? same mode of working as before

sv list of issues compilled

garbage for chandles: was editorial mistake
Joao to submit the editorial change.

Who is in charge to integrate erratas in the LRM? Probably Stuart.

Dave Smith is collecting erratas.

Question on the BNF:
Andrzej: two specialized productions
       or  uniform set of production with semantical restrictions : on
the 
type of formal arguments and passing argument mode not permitted for
DPI.
Andrzej and Joao by Friday will send to the cc committee a proposed set
of 
changes to correct this problem. By next meeting have a proposed errata.
1 
week review period set by Accellera shall be obeyed.

Joao prefers the uniform production.
Swapnajit: if any changes in the set of rules inthe BNF, does it have
any 
impact on the other parts of the bnf.
Changes to the basic production defining function will have an impact.
single change in a single place.

Joao stated that this change needs to be agreed by other committees.

deadline for next meeting  to review list of  issues which was sent out

Meeting ajourned.

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jul 16 2003 - 14:28:38 PDT