Subject: [sv-cc] Action item on the Import DPI derivation rule
From: Francoise Martinolle (fm@cadence.com)
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 08:45:44 PDT
My Action item regarding the import DPI derivation rules:
Since I did not have any reply to my post to the bc reflector, I brought
this up at the BC meeting on Monday
Someone (I don't remember who and there is no meeting minutes yet) on the
BC committee is going to check with stephen Boyd and Stuart to find out why
was this changed.
They also noted that function was redundant and asked if we wanted to have
the keyword "function" back.
I said that we would like to have the function keyword in the derivation
rules for DPI
for consistency.
Francoise
'
At 12:05 AM 7/23/2003 +0000, Swapnajit Mittra wrote:
> Before I go to the regular agenda etc., my request
> to all the members: please to try to attend the
> weekly calls. Things have started heating up and
> you do not want to miss the actions (not to mention
> your voting right).
>
> o Agenda:
>
> - Regular procedural work [Swapnajit, 5 minutes]
> - Feedback on errata of SV3.1: Anything else to
> add? [Swapnajit/all, 5 minutes] (1387.html)
> - Action item# 2: Feedback from SV-BC [Francoise/all,
> 10 minutes] (1376.html)
> - Action item# 1: BNF issue [Andrzej, 20 minutes].
> (1385.html)
> - Any other topic you would like to bring up.
>
> o Telecon info:
> On the website: http://www.eda.org/sv-cc/
>
>--
>Swapnajit Mittra
>Project VeriPage ::: http://www.angelfire.com/ca/verilog
>
>________________________________________________________________
>The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
>Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
>Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 08:46:58 PDT