Subject: [sv-cc] VPI vote
From: Francoise Martinolle (fm@cadence.com)
Date: Wed Jan 21 2004 - 20:19:23 PST
I am sorry to be consistently a pain with the voting process but I am going
to vote no.
I feel that there are too many issues that I found daily in the VPI SV
model to be able to accept its final form to be integrated in the LRM.
Joao, Charles Dawson and myself have spent a lot of time on this
definition, but this is a huge huge huge task and it cannot be rushed. It
is better everyday but still not satisfactory to me.
I know that there are some deadlines set for the specification and this is
the reason why we have to vote now, but personally I cannot vote to accept
a definition that is being changed during the vote.
Francoise
'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 21 2004 - 20:23:27 PST