[sv-cc] Re: questions on SV-CC 313/PTF 296

What in the end about this? 1800 and 1364 need to be coordinated.

Shalom

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com wrote:

> Is it important that the Generates diagram follow 26.6.2?
> It causes all the following diagrams to be renumbered.
> That is not a problem for me, since all the internal 1364 cross-references
> are automatically updated, but it's a lot of work for Stu Sutherland to
> fix the references from the 1800 doc to the 1364 doc (assuming he did
> not already change them), it messes up the references in the data bases,
> and some people are already used to the current numbering.
>
> Could Generates be put at the end instead?
>
> Thanks,
> Shalom
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Charles Dawson wrote:
>
> > > SV-CC 313/PTF 296:
> > >
> > > The proposal says,
> > >
> > > "Add the following section after 26.6.2:
> > >
> > > 26.6.2' Generates"
> > >
> > > I don't understand what to do with a sub-clause number " 26.6.2' ".
> > >
> > The new section needs to go between 26.6.2 and 26.6.3. I did not
> > know what to call it, so I called it 26.6.2 prime. At the end, I
> > think all the sections after 26.6.2 will need to be renumbered.
>
>

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary