[sv-cc] modified sv_vpi_user.h to test

I have attached a modified sv_vpi_user.h file with all of the changes from
approved changes added in. Please verify that the modifications are
correct, and that the file compiles OK (if that is possible for anyone to
test).

I have attached both the .h file for testing, and a PDF of the LRM, which
shows the deletions and additions to the erratum #158 version of the file.

As you probably know, erratum #158 replaced the entire file, and several
other errata modified the file (62, 123, 213, 256, 257, 295, 333). Most of
the changes were specified on the pre-#158 version of the file, but were not
a problem to add to the #158 version. However, I do have questions on two
of the changes.

Change #62 specified a location to add a constant that no longer exists. I
added the new constant in what seemed a logical location, and changed the
constant value to fit that new location. Please verify that what I did was
correct. The new constant is:

  #define vpiArrayMember 607

The following constants originally had values with a single bit set (1,2,4).
The revised header file (from #158) uses simple binary count values (1,2,3).
Erratum #267 adds two more constants, following the old convention (sort
of). Are these values OK? Was the original one-hot pattern needed? Since
the original values were changed by 158 anyway, can I just re-sequence all
the values after adding #267 (1,2,3,4,5)?

WAS:
  #define vpiQualifier 621
  #define vpiUniqueQualifier 1
  #define vpiPriorityQualifier 2
  #define vpiTaggedQualifier 4

AFTER #158 and #267
  #define vpiQualifier 621
  #define vpiNoQualifier 0
  #define vpiUniqueQualifier 1
  #define vpiPriorityQualifier 2
  #define vpiTaggedQualifier 3
  #define vpiRandQualifier 8

Please respond ASAP. All editing closes this afternoon, Pacific time.

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898