[sv-cc] RE: [sv-champions] Email vote on items for the 1/26/05 meeting

SV-CC,

Stu found some more issues with the sv_vpi_user.h file.
The recently passed item #52 had one more change, and Stu
was concerned about one non-sequential numbering in the file.

I uploaded a new version of the file called sv_vpi_user-stumods.h.
The diffs from the previous version are as follows:

% diff sv_vpi_user.h sv_vpi_user-stumods.h
253c253
< #define vpiRandQualifier 8

---
> #define vpiRandQualifier       4
285a286,288
> /*********************** task/function properties
***********************/
> #define vpiOtherFunc            6 /* returns other types; for property
vpiFuncType */
> 
Charles,
Should we take a quick email vote on accepting these last-minute
changes,
so that Stu can finish up his editing work in time for the draft ballot?
Thanks and regards,
Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francoise Martinolle [mailto:fm@cadence.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 10:03 AM
> To: Warmke, Doug; 'Charles Dawson'
> Subject: FW: [sv-champions] Email vote on items for the 
> 1/26/05 meeting
> 
>  
> Stuart has found more issues with the header file.
> 
> See below.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Stuart Sutherland
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 12:28 PM
> To: sv-champions@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Email vote on items for the 
> 1/26/05 meeting
> 
> 
>  
> > SVDB issue 052 (SV-CC Unanimous)
> > 
> > _X__  Recommend approval
> > ___  Recommend return to SV-CC
> > ___  Have a meeting and discuss
> > 
> > SVDB issue 353 (SV-CC Unanimous)
> > 
> > ___  Recommend approval
> > _X__  Recommend return to SV-CC
> > ___  Have a meeting and discuss
> 
> I would change my vote to yes if the following four changes are made:
> 
> 1) The constant vpiOtherFunc from #52 should be included in the
> sv_vpi_user.h file in #353.
> 
> 2) The constant vpiRandQualifier in the sv_vpi_user.h file is not
> sequentially numbered with the previous constants in that 
> group.  The CC
> committee should renumber vpiRandQualifier or justify the 
> non-sequential
> numbering.
> 
> 3) The modified sv_vpi_user.h after these two corrections 
> should be tested
> and uploaded again.
> 
> 4) A note is added to both the data base and at the beginning 
> of the text
> file describing what changes that says the sv_vpi_user.h file 
> included with
> #353 supersedes the modifications to that file from errata 
> 52, 62, 123, 158,
> 213, 265, 267, 295, 332, and 333.
> 
> > Boyd.com database 643 (ETF Unanimous)
> > 
> > _X__  Recommend approval
> > ___  Recommend return to ETF
> > ___  Have a meeting and discuss
> 
> It is worth noting that #353 is not really a new item.  It is 
> an editorial
> correction to #158 that was entered into P1800/D3.  #158 replace the
> sv_vpi_user.h file with an untested file, that proved to have several
> errors.
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Stuart Sutherland
> stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
> +1-503-692-0898
>  
> 
> 
> 
>