Re: [sv-cc] 62, 63, and 301: On 31.10 Variables

Should we add a note describing this ?

Regards,
-Michael

Jim Vellenga wrote:

>Yes, that's certainly one way. Another (and possibly
>safer, in that it would handle empty ranges, if such
>things can exist) would be to find the ranges of
>the vpiElemTypespec of the vpiArrayTypespec of the
>array var.
>
>Regards,
>Jim V.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381
>Engineering Director (FAX) 978-262-6636
>Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com
>270 Billerica Rd
>Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
>"We all work with partial information."
>----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>] -----Original Message-----
>] From: Francoise Martinolle
>] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:10 PM
>] To: Jim Vellenga; sv-cc@eda.org
>] Subject: RE: [sv-cc] 62, 63, and 301: On 31.10 Variables
>]
>] I am reviewing these changes and I have a question regarding
>] note 4 of 31.10
>] vpiRange iteration says that it only return the unpacked
>] ranges for an array
>] var
>] and the packed ranges for a bit or logic var.
>] How do we get the packed ranges of an array var? Do we have
>] to iterate on
>] vpiReg from the
>] array var and get the variable which represent the vector
>] element of the
>] array?
>]
>]
>] Francoise
>] '
>]
>]
>] -----Original Message-----
>] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On
>] Behalf Of Jim
>] Vellenga
>] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 2:24 PM
>] To: sv-cc@eda.org
>] Subject: [sv-cc] 62, 63, and 301: On 31.10 Variables
>]
>] I have looked jointly at the changes made for the following items:
>]
>] -- 62 (assigned Joao, proposal by Francoise)
>]
>] -- 63 (assigned to and proposal by Michael)
>]
>] -- 301 (assigned to and proposal by JimV)
>]
>] I have verified to my own satisfaction that P1800/D3 has these changes
>] edited in correctly. But since they are non-trivially
>] related, someone else
>] should probably look at them. If someone else agrees, then
>] we can move them
>] to "Closed".
>]
>] Regards,
>] Jim V.
>
>

-- 
NOTE: The content of this message may contain personal views 
      which are not neccessarily the views of Freescale, unless specifically stated.
 
         ___________________________________________________
        |                                                   |
      _ | Michael Rohleder            Tel: +49-89-92103-259 | _
     / )| Freescale Semiconductor     Fax: +49-89-92103-680 |( \
    / / |      Freescale Halbleiter Deutschland GmbH        | \ \
  _( (_ |  _   Schatzbogen 7, D-81829 Munich, Germany    _  | _) )_
 (((\ \>|_/ >                                           < \_|</ /)))
 (\\\\ \_/ /    mailto:Michael.Rohleder@freescale.com     \ \_/ ////)
  \       /_______________________________________________\       /
   \    _/                                                 \_    /
   /   /                                                     \   \
The information contained in this email has been classified as:
General Business Information                     ( )
Freescale Internal Use Only         ( )
Freescale Confidential Proprietary  ( )
*** This note may contain Freescale Confidential Proprietary or Freescale Internal Use Only Information and is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. 
    Thank you! ***