Oh well, sorry. Fig attached.
-- Dr. Bassam Tabbara Architect, R&D Novas Software, Inc. (408) 467-7893 _____ From: Bassam Tabbara [mailto:bassam@novas.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 4:27 PM To: 'sv-cc@eda.org' Cc: 'chas@cadence.com'; 'stuart@sutherland-hdl.com'; 'Warmke, Doug' Subject: SV LRM Review: 277, and 265 Charles, please help with status update since I can't ... Doug need your help with one item below. 277: Please move state to Closed. 265: I found two minor issues, please assign back to SV-LRM. 1) Annex I, p. 624 (skipped in 265 but obviously apparent now ...), the "NOTE: Assertion VPI has been assigned the numerical range 780-799" should be crossed out. ----> Doug can you update the actual file please ?? Or Stu you can do that, right ? 2) Annex I, p. 625, "vpiAssume" should be "vpiAssume," (inside a comment no biggy ... still ...). I attach a jpg so it should be clear what I am talking about. Please let me know if any questions. Thx. -Bassam. -- Dr. Bassam Tabbara Architect, R&D Novas Software, Inc. (408) 467-7893
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 25 2005 - 16:28:31 PST