A couple more minor comments:
Note 5
------
I also have a concern about the revision to note 5 in section 31.46.
You've added the phrase "which are prefixed by a data type name". It
seems to me, from the description of assignment patterns in the
proposal for 254, that one can always determine the type by context.
Is that not true?
If it is true, then I would recommend leaving the phrase out.
If it is not true, then we should reword the sentence for clarity,
because the way it reads now, the phrase "which are prefixed by a data
type name" at first seems as if it could apply to one, two, or three of
the object types that precede it in the sentence. A strict analysis of
the parsing shows that it applies to exactly two, but that's not
obvious on a quick read. I'd be happy to suggest a rewording if
necessary.
Note 7
------
All of the new Note 7 should be in blue.
Overall
-------
With the amendments noted above, all this looks good, workable, and
ready to go. Thanks for doing it.
Regards,
Jim V.
---------------------------------------------------------
James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381
Engineering Director (FAX) 978-262-6636
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information."
----------------------------------------------------------
] -----Original Message-----
] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On
] Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:49 AM
] To: sv-cc@eda.org
] Cc: Charlie Dawson
] Subject: [sv-cc] errata 373
]
] as everyone had the chance to review the proposal I uploaded
] yesterday night?
] Please send any comments to the reflector.
] We need to agree on this today.
]
] Francoise
] '
]
Received on Thu Feb 10 08:26:31 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 10 2005 - 08:26:34 PST