[sv-cc] Item 160 (Fix fine but one other nit)

Stu Sutherland's 2/7/05 fix to item 160's bugnote of 1/21/05 is fine.

However, there is another error, which is my mine alone and was
discovered today.
2/18/05.  In section E.6.6, the first numbered item in a list reads "If
a packed part...(see E.6.5 and 6.9.3)."

With the new numbering scheme, the correct reference to a section on the
equivalence of packed 
types would be "(see E.6.5 and 6.9.2)".

I've added a bugnote to this effect.  My apologies for the oversight.

Ralph Duncan