Re: [SPAM] - [sv-cc] Proposals added for #422, #423, and #427 - Email found in subject

Hello Bassam,

thanks a lot for your feedback. Comments interspersed...

Best regards,
-Michael

Bassam Tabbara wrote:

>Michael/all,
>
>1) I think we had an outstanding AI when it comes to 422 to remove all
>the "re-educating" about VPI naming, so I suggest to extend 422 in your
>proposal to also remove 30.1.2. It was not requested because of an
>oversight I suspect even within CC Francoise had strongly suggested we
>remove (note that it was taken out of 31 for that reason :-)!).
>
>  
>
Good idea, but I am unsure about the procedural aspects of such a 
modification. To my understanding
we are only permitted to work on ballot issues  and I am unsure whether 
this covers areas where we
are _extending_ such ballot issues.

>2) As far as 423, while the assertion in the ticket is valid i.e. it
>*is* integrated into design navigation VPI. Since this chapter is
>separate and focused on access/traversal/value callbacks I strongly urge
>we *keep* this section, also keep its counter in 30.
>
>BTW, on a side note: I've also updated a few of the bugs assigned to me,
>but waiting to get one single email out to all of 'em also in case I
>revisit some of the earlier ones :-) So stay tuned for that.
>
>Thx.
>-Bassam. 
>
>
>--
>Dr. Bassam Tabbara
>Architect, R&D
>Novas Software, Inc.
>(408) 467-7893
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
>Michael Rohleder
>Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:12 AM
>To: SystemVerilog CC DWG
>Subject: [SPAM] - [sv-cc] Proposals added for #422, #423, and #427 -
>Email found in subject
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have uploaded proposals for the Mantis items #422, #423, and #427.
>Some observations:
> - w.r.t. #422:
>   Section 29.1.1 is basically equivalent to section 30.1.2. However, I
>have not found any request to also remove section 30.1.2, which would be
>legal for the same reasons it is legal to remove section 29.1.1.
> - w.r.t. #423:
>   Section 29.2 is basically equivalent to section 30.4.2. However, I
>have not found any request to also remove section 30.4.2, which would be
>legal for the same reasons it is legal to remove section 29.2.
>   Also there is a section 30.4.1, which is empty, and misplaced here. 
>The diagrams are located in section 32, therefore I assume this is a
>leftover of a previous cleanup ...
>
>Best regards,
>-Michael
>
>
>  
>


-- 

NOTE: The content of this message may contain personal views 
      which are not neccessarily the views of Freescale, unless specifically stated.
 
         ___________________________________________________
        |                                                   |
      _ | Michael Rohleder            Tel: +49-89-92103-259 | _
     / )| Freescale Semiconductor     Fax: +49-89-92103-680 |( \
    / / |      Freescale Halbleiter Deutschland GmbH        | \ \
  _( (_ |  _   Schatzbogen 7, D-81829 Munich, Germany    _  | _) )_
 (((\ \>|_/ >                                           < \_|</ /)))
 (\\\\ \_/ /    mailto:Michael.Rohleder@freescale.com     \ \_/ ////)
  \       /_______________________________________________\       /
   \    _/                                                 \_    /
   /   /                                                     \   \

The information contained in this email has been classified as:
General Business Information                     ( )
Freescale Internal Use Only         ( )
Freescale Confidential Proprietary  ( )


*** This note may contain Freescale Confidential Proprietary or Freescale Internal Use Only Information and is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. 
    Thank you! ***