I have reviewed these items, and agree that all but item 415 are ready for approval. Item 415 does not clearly explain what needs to be changed. The current change description essentially says "make the diagram look like it did before, but keep the corrections that have been made". The editor (that's me) will need an accurate description of the exact changes that need to be made. I cannot approve this item until a detailed proposal is put forth and reviewed. Stu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stuart Sutherland stuart@sutherland-hdl.com +1-503-692-0898 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On > Behalf Of Charles Dawson > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 3:25 PM > To: SV-CC > Subject: [sv-cc] More trivial items > > Hi All, > > The following items: > - Item 542 26.2.4 inconsistency > - Item 540 26.1 inconsistency > - Item 415 26.6.3 improperly drawn diagram - regression > - Item 414 26.6.42 'taskfunc' should be 'task func' > - Item 413 Need parens at end of routine call properties > > Also fit under the trivial and obvious criteria. These are > V-PTF items which is why I missed them in the first pass. > > As we did with the other similar items, if no one objects we > will pass them as a block. I'll hold off on them until our > Monday meeting so you will have some time to take a look at them. > > -Chas > > > -- > Charles Dawson > Senior Engineering Manager > NC-Verilog Team > Cadence Design Systems, Inc. > 270 Billerica Road > Chelmsford, MA 01824 > (978) 262 - 6273 > chas@cadence.com > > > >Received on Fri Apr 8 08:12:01 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 08 2005 - 08:12:06 PDT