Hey Jim, some good catches here ... As we discussed before the aim should be to delete the notes, so no sense in "correcting" those of course, but yeah some things are missing see section (2) below. 1) No changes if notes deleted: vpiIfOp / vpiIfElseOp ---> should be (vpi_user.h) vpiIf and vpiIfElse so no fix needed here if deleted I think ... vpiMultiConcat ---> vpiMultiConcatOp (no comment on the existence or lack of Op !). vpiDelayedImplyOp is really vpiNonOverlapImplyOp (vpiOverlapImplyOp can be used in same places too...). 2) To ADD in sv_vpi_user.h (used in sequence/property composition) A) vpiOr or vpiOrOp (latter better) B) vpiAndOp C) vpiUnboundedConst (this is $) D) vpiAssertion (32.31) Thx. -Bassam. -- Dr. Bassam Tabbara Architect, R&D Novas Software Inc. (408) 467-7893 -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Jim Vellenga Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 2:01 PM To: Duncan, Ralph; SV-CC Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Proposal uploaded for 487 Curious, For Note 2 of 32.34, which we're proposing to move: vpi_user.h has a #define for vpiNotOp. sv_vpi_user.h defines vpiImplyOp. But I don't see a #define in either for vpiDelayedImplyOp, vpiAndOp, vpiOrOp, vpiIfOp, or vpiIfElseOp. Can anyone else confirm or disconfirm this? Was there a ballot issue on this? And since I'm pulling on this thread, No1e 1 in 32.36 also has vpiAndOp and vpiOr (instead of vpiOrOp). The others from that note do appear in sv_vpi_user.h. However, sv_vpi_user.h also defines vpiOverlapImplyOp and vpiNonOverlapImplyOp, which are _not_ used anywhere else in the standard! And while Note 1 of 32.39 -- as well as the corresponding note in the 1364 draft standard -- refer to vpiMultiConcat, the actual definition in vpi_user.h is vpiMultiConcatOp. Annoying. If someone else confirms, I'll put in a Mantis item. Regards, Jim Vellenga --------------------------------------------------------- James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381 Engineering Director (FAX) 978-262-6636 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com 270 Billerica Rd Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 "We all work with partial information." ---------------------------------------------------------- ] -----Original Message----- ] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On ] Behalf Of Duncan, Ralph ] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 7:04 PM ] To: SV-CC ] Subject: [sv-cc] Proposal uploaded for 487 ] ] 487: mentioning operand order for property-expression operations. ] ] I've uploaded a proposal that moves the text as suggested. It is not ] clear whether this really gains anything. ] ] Ralph ] ]Received on Mon Apr 18 14:44:12 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 18 2005 - 14:44:40 PDT