Doug, the proposals look good. 485 was especially clear, and answered most of the questions I had. One question on 485, though: The current proposal says that "A thread is a Verilog process." This differs slightly from 10.7, which also identifies the parallel branches of fork-joins as separate threads. Do we want to include the fork-join branches as threads as well? Regards, Jim V. --------------------------------------------------------- James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381 Engineering Director (FAX) 978-262-6636 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com 270 Billerica Rd Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 "We all work with partial information." ---------------------------------------------------------- ] -----Original Message----- ] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On ] Behalf Of Warmke, Doug ] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 1:17 AM ] To: sv-cc@eda.org ] Subject: [sv-cc] Proposals uploaded ] ] Charles, Team, ] ] I went through all my assigned items and uploaded proposals: ] ] http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000418 ] http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000449 ] http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000483 ] http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000485 ] http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000685 ] ] Item 706 is over my head, Charles. ] ] http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000685 ] ] Could you please assign it to someone else? ] ] Thanks, ] Doug ] ] ]Received on Fri May 6 05:20:15 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 06 2005 - 05:20:33 PDT