Re: [sv-cc] Uploaded proposal for 686

Jim,

Yes, that is correct.  The number should be 472 and not 427.
Sorry about that.

--Jim G.

Jim Vellenga wrote:

>Jim, was that supposed to be 472 instead of 427?
>
>Regards,
>Jim V.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------- 
>James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
>Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
>Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
>270 Billerica Rd 
>Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 
>"We all work with partial information." 
>---------------------------------------------------------- 
>  
> 
>
>] -----Original Message-----
>] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
>] Behalf Of Jim Garnett
>] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 6:54 PM
>] To: sv-cc@eda.org
>] Subject: [sv-cc] Uploaded proposal for 686
>] 
>] I have submitted a proposal for item 686 and believe that
>] item 427 can be cloased as a duplicate of 528.
>] 
>] --Jim G.
>] 
>] 
>] 
>] 
>] 
>
>  
>