RE: [sv-cc] item 447

It makes sense in this case because the legal values
of vpiAccessType when applied to a vpiInterfaceTfDecl
are a subset of all the legal values for vpiAccessType
in general.  And in any case, in view of the limited
time we have before going to ballot, it doesn't hurt
for now.

Regards,
Jim V.

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd 
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 
"We all work with partial information." 
---------------------------------------------------------- 
  
 

] -----Original Message-----
] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
] Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 1:44 PM
] To: sv-cc@eda.org
] Subject: [sv-cc] item 447
] 
] Is there a reason why we need to have a note for the specific 
] values allowed for vpiAccessType?
] This seems to be inconsistent with the rules we had to not 
] specify values of properties in notes.
]  
] Francoise
]        '
]