[sv-cc] [Fwd: BOUNCE sv-cc@eda.org: Non-member submission from ["Geoffrey.Coram" <Geoffrey.Coram@analog.com>]]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: BOUNCE sv-cc@eda.org:    Non-member submission from ["Geoffrey.Coram" <Geoffrey.Coram@analog.com>]
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:46:13 -0800 (PST)
From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org
To: sv-cc-approval@eda.org

 >From owner-sv-cc Fri Feb  3 09:46:07 2006
Received: from nwd2mail3.analog.com (nwd2mail3.analog.com [137.71.25.52])
	by server.eda.org (8.12.10/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id k13Hk66T021505;
	Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nwd2mhb2.analog.com (nwd2mhb2.analog.com [137.71.6.12])
	by nwd2mail3.analog.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k13Hk0es014008;
	Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:46:00 -0500
Received: from titania.adsdesign.analog.com (titania.adsdesign.analog.com [10.66.62.63])
	by nwd2mhb2.analog.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_28810+JAGae91741)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19964;
	Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:45:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from horse.adsdesign.analog.com (horse [10.66.22.94])
	by titania.adsdesign.analog.com (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id k13HjxW01372;
	Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:45:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from analog.com (horse [10.66.22.94])
	by horse.adsdesign.analog.com (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id k13Hjwe25273;
	Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:45:58 -0500 (EST)
Sender: geoffrey.coram@analog.com
Message-ID: <43E396D6.333DCA41@analog.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:45:58 -0500
From: "Geoffrey.Coram" <Geoffrey.Coram@analog.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
CC: "'Bresticker, Shalom'" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>, sv-bc@server.eda.org,
         sv-ac@server.eda.org, sv-ec@server.eda.org, sv-cc@server.eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-bc] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800
References: <200602030911699.SM07504@WileECoyote>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0
	tests=USER_IN_WHITELIST
	version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.000002 (2004-11-16)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 137.71.25.52
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/1274/Fri Feb  3 06:43:35 2006 on server.eda.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean

It's a somewhat different situation, but I certainly find it
a nuisance that the Verilog-AMS LRM is a separate document
from the 1364 LRM on which it is based; the AMS LRM includes
many fundamental Verilog items only by reference, which makes
it hard to look things up.

So, I support doing the merge sooner rather than later.

-Geoffrey



Stuart Sutherland wrote:
 >
 > You mention you have colleagues that use the LRMs, but have you asked them
 > whether they would prefer working with a single LRM or having to refer to
 > two different LRMs for the same language?

-- 
Geoffrey J. Coram, Ph.D.    Staff CAD Engineer
Analog Devices, Inc.
804 Woburn St., MS-422,     Tel (781) 937-1924
Wilmington, MA 01887        Fax (781) 937-1014


-- 
Charles Dawson
Senior Engineering Manager
NC-Verilog Team
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
270 Billerica Road
Chelmsford, MA  01824
(978) 262 - 6273
chas@cadence.com