Ralph, I agree that this works -- i.e., is sufficient. But I was wondering if you had considered adding the integer and time types to the mapping table in F.6.4. To me, that would seem more consistent with the general flow. Regards, Jim --------------------------------------------------------- James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381 Engineering Director (FAX) 978-262-6636 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com 270 Billerica Rd Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 "We all work with partial information." ---------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Duncan, Ralph Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:41 PM To: sv-cc@verilog.org Subject: [sv-cc] Mantis 1570: integer and time types New Mantis item 1570: Currently, LRM section F.6.3 states that SV types 'integer' and 'time' are legal as base types for enumeration types and are represented as 4-state packed types in canonical form. However, there is no explicit mention of whether 'integer' and 'time' are legal DPI import formal types as . stand-alone types . element types of arrays, . struct field types, etc. The proposal would clarify things by adding a one sentence bullet to F.6.3 saying that 'integer' and 'time' are represented on the C side as 4-state packed arrays with 32 and 64-bit lengths, respectively. Thanks for considering the proposal; please let everyone know if you have comments, concerns or related issues. Ralph Ralph Duncan Mentor Graphics San Jose, CAReceived on Wed Aug 30 08:04:58 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 30 2006 - 08:05:08 PDT