Our next SV-CC meeting is on 05/09/2007. The call-in information for this meeting is as follows: U.S. 866-807-0627 International 203-955-5179 Passcode 399143 Meeting will start at 12:00pm EDT (4:00pm GMT), and last for 1 hour. AGENDA 1. Review Patent information Go to: http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt 2. Review minutes from last meeting (05/09/2007) 3. Liaisons - Francoise to report on PASSED SV-BC items - Anyone care to make a report? 4. New business - Action items from Neil on draft 3. - Request to BC committee to consider language in the LRM to require implementations to have a mapping file which will bind names to $units objects? - Stu's question on the merged DPI clauses. - Chuck's writeup of the consensus we reached at the face to face on packed arrays (Item 1230). - Others? 5. Review SV-CC items with proposals: - Item 1726 Clarify meaning of vpiConstantSelect - Item 1741 1800-2005 Section 27.50 Issues with foreach diagram - Item 1385 Please document compatibility issues between 1364 and 1800 VPI 6. Review SV-CC items with proposals (Straw poll only): - Others? 7. Review old business: - Francoise and Bassam to continue work on assignment patterns. - Francoise to champion adding support for typed parameters to the typespec diagrams. - Abi to champion adding support for parameterized classes. - Abi/JimV to champion improving the ability to compare objects. - All to verify their Acknowledged Mantis Items. - Steve to send out exact text on referring to a prior version. - Chas to gather a list of all SV-CC approved mantis items which have not been incorporated into draft 2. - Francoise, with Chuck's help, to put few questions together and send it to Michael on deprecation of the term memory. - Francoise to inquire from sv-bc on the current thinking regarding deprecation of the term memory. - Francoise to ask Stu from user perspective on need for callbacks in the pre and post observed regions. - Michael to provide user perspective on need for callbacks in the pre and post observed regions -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue May 22 14:33:27 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 22 2007 - 14:33:45 PDT