thanks Shalom, I re-uploaded the proposal with this note. -----Original Message----- From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:20 PM To: Moorhouse, Abigail; sv-cc@server.eda-stds.org Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Mantis item 1367 updated It should have the section number, which is 36.13. Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Moorhouse, Abigail > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 12:17 AM > To: sv-cc@server.eda-stds.org > Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Mantis item 1751 updated > > hi Charles, SV-CCers, > Mantis 1367 is a trivial typo that we could just vote on and be done > with (bolding the port and port bit object definitions). I uploaded a > proposal, can we put it on the agenda and if people plan to discuss > it, can they read it first, and let me know what problem they have > found before the meeting, please? > > (this is to help Charles meet the 10-per-meeting target of reducing > the Mantis backlog!). > > thanks, > Abi > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 4 14:28:29 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 04 2007 - 14:28:39 PDT