[sv-cc] RE: [P1800] SV-CC items which already have proposals

Charles,

I went through the 150 SV-CC items that are still unresolved and 
checked ones that I thought might have proposals.  As of this writing, 
At least the following unresolved Mantis items also have proposals 
attached:

0000788: Should we return vpiOtherFunc for vpiFuncType when on a void 
function?
0000880: DPI functions should be allowed to return non-small values
0000985: cbSizeChange for queues too?
0001230: How to represent packed arrays of complex types in VPI
0001231: Wrong cross reference in DPI Clause 26.2.2
0001603: Unused vpiMultiArray declaration in vpi_user.h
0001700: vpiTimeConst and vpiNullConst have the same value
0001752: Clarify vpiFile and vpiLineNo in general
0002101: svDpiVersion needs to return "1800-2008"

The following Mantis items need to be marked Resolved, in that we have 
approved them in previous meetings (although the proposals may need to 
be updated to reflect Draft 4):

0001343: Wrong unpacked array correspondence between C and SV
0001456: Clarify, circumscribe restrictions on use of DPI context 
utilities
0002009: HDL example shown in detail 3 section 36.14 (Reference 
objects) has errors.

Regards,
Jim Vellenga

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Software Architect                     (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information." 
----------------------------------------------------------  

]-----Original Message-----
]From: owner-ieee1800@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1800@eda.org] 
]On Behalf Of Charlie Dawson
]Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:05 PM
]To: IEEE1800
]Subject: [P1800] SV-CC items which already have proposals
]
]Hi P1800 Committee:
]
]As I reported at the last P1800 meeting, I neglected to include on
]the SV-CC list of items for consideration the Mantis Items which
]already had proposals.  I said I would send out this list, and
]here it is:
]
]   - Item 1741 1800-2005 Section 27.50 Issues with foreach diagram
]   - Item 2054 Draft 3A, Section 40 - Deprecate Data Read API
]   - Item 1952 "Null Argument" to mean "omitted Argument" may 
]be confusing
]   - Item 2094 Need to extend VPI to handle class specializations
]   - Item 0748 vpiParent of var select can only be array var
]   - Item 1599 The assertion API and VPI sections need changes 
]as per mantis #805
]
]These have been on the SV-CC agenda/minutes for several meetings now.
]
]   -Chas
]
]-- 
]Charles Dawson
]Senior Engineering Manager
]NC-Verilog Team
]Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
]270 Billerica Road
]Chelmsford, MA  01824
](978) 262 - 6273
]chas@cadence.com
]
]
]-- 
]This message has been scanned for viruses and
]dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
]believed to be clean.
]
]

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.