All- I have uploaded a new complete proposal that includes changes based on feedback from last meeting's discussion for vpi_get_value_array, and a complete vpi_put_value_array proposal (all-in-one now). The vpi_get_value_array changes include: - Language tweaks as per Jim Vellenga's inputs ("dynamic element" clarified, etc.); - Corrections per Abi Moorehouse feedback- Abi I decided that mixing formats vs. array datatypes would adversely affect efficiency & were not likely worth it- we can update this down the road if it really is needed. - Added vpiVectorVal format in both functions (as per Charlie Dawson's request). - Added vpiLongIntVal format in both functions (per Jim V.'s inputs). Note also that for various technical/complexity reasons, the vpi_put_value_array does NOT include the delay and event scheduling semantics included in vpi_put_value. This can be upgraded down the road to include this if needed (the new format and flag values were chosen so as to be non-conflicting if we want to add this later). Charlie please ensure this is included in the "expedited items" part of the agenda for next week. Regards, Chuck -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Mar 21 10:05:09 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 21 2008 - 10:05:21 PDT