[sv-cc] 2226 draft 6.

hi Charlie, SV-CC
Unfortunately I will be on vacation for next week's meeting so I can't
champion this. I hope it is uncontroversial and you can vote on it in my
absence though.
Abi

-----Original Message-----
From: Moorhouse, Abigail 
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 10:09 AM
To: 'Jim Vellenga'; Charlie Dawson; SV-CC
Subject: RE: [sv-cc] No SV-CC meeting today

OK, I have followed Jim's suggestion.
I have uploaded four draft 6 files, one each of FrameMaker and PDF for
the vpi_user.h and sv_vpi_user.h changes.
I consider the change to add the vpiObjId less controversial and more
necessary. Search the AnnexN files for vpiObjId to see the change.

The other change fixes something 'real', for anyone who has an
application that includes acc_user.h or veriuser.h in any file ahead of
vpi_user.h, but the existing draft 5 proposal is self-consistent without
it, and the workaround is to promote vpi_user.h ahead of any of the
others in the application source code. Search the AnnexL files for SVPI
to see the change.

I'd appreciate a review and thanks to Jim for already taking the time,
Abi 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:vellenga@cadence.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:15 AM
To: Moorhouse, Abigail; Charlie Dawson; SV-CC
Subject: RE: [sv-cc] No SV-CC meeting today

I'm thinking that you could add a revised proposal without deleting the
existing one, with a Note saying that this new one has not yet been
approved by the SV-CC.
Then the SV-CC could consider it and (assuming that we agree to the
changes) petition the Working Group to allow a substitution on the
grounds that we found typographical inconsistencies.

Regards,
Jim Vellenga

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Software Architect                     (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information." 
----------------------------------------------------------  

]-----Original Message-----
]From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On ]Behalf Of
Moorhouse, Abigail
]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:45 PM
]To: Moorhouse, Abigail; Charlie Dawson; SV-CC
]Subject: RE: [sv-cc] No SV-CC meeting today ] ]minor change - vpiObjId
is a property and should therefore come after ]the vpiAllocScheme line:
]
]#define vpiAllocScheme           656 /* Mantis 2226 */ 
]#define vpiObjId          <editor to fill>
]
]-----Original Message-----
]From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On
]Behalf Of Moorhouse, Abigail
]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:01 AM
]To: Charlie Dawson; SV-CC
]Subject: RE: [sv-cc] No SV-CC meeting today ] ]hi Charlie, all, ]I was
hoping for a meeting because I have a couple of issues. Here is ]the
first one.
]
]I have identified a couple of necessary but minor changes to 2226
](dynamic objects).
]#1 - vpiObjId doesn't have a #define
]#2 - placing the new 64-bit vpi_user.h type definitions within the
]PLI_TYPES include guards has the unfortunate consequence that ]they
don't ]get defined if there is a preceding acc_user.h or veriuser.h file
]included in the 'C' file (since it uses the same guard, but doesn't
]define the 64-bit types).
]
]I would like to either
]
]a) edit the existing proposal (preferred, but probably too late)
]b) create a new proposal to fix these things ] ]The first change is
obviously necessary in order to use the Object ID!
]If I can't edit the existing proposal to add an editor-define constant
]then I will propose an actual constant so we can all agree on ]it
outside ]the 2009 spec. The second change is an actual-usage irritant
]that people ]using the new vpi_user.h may encounter as I did.
]
]The changes are basically:
]in Draft 6/Annex L (vpi_user.h) change
]
]#ifndef PLI_TYPES
]#define PLI_TYPES
]typedef int PLI_INT32;
]typedef unsigned int PLI_UINT32;
]typedef short PLI_INT16;
]typedef unsigned short PLI_UINT16;
]typedef char PLI_BYTE8;
]typedef unsigned char PLI_UBYTE8;
]#endif
]
]to
]
]#ifndef SVPI_TYPES
]#define SVPI_TYPES
]typedef int64_t	 		PLI_INT64;
]typedef uint64_t	 	      PLI_UINT64;
]#endif#ifndef PLI_TYPES
]#define PLI_TYPES
]typedef int PLI_INT32;
]typedef unsigned int PLI_UINT32;
]typedef short PLI_INT16;
]typedef unsigned short PLI_UINT16;
]typedef char PLI_BYTE8;
]typedef unsigned char PLI_UBYTE8;
]#endif
]
]
](the 2226 proposal has the new types within the original include guard)
]and in Draft 6/Annex O (sv_vpi_user.h) change #define vpiPackedArrayNet
]693 to
]
]#define vpiPackedArrayNet 693
]#define vpiObjId          <editor to fill>
]
]Abi
]-----Original Message-----
]From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On
]Behalf Of Charlie Dawson
]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 5:53 AM
]To: SV-CC
]Subject: [sv-cc] No SV-CC meeting today ] ]Hi All, ] ]Sorry for the
short notice.  Cadence has a meeting today which ]conflicts ]with the
SV-CC meeting.  Without any Cadence folks there, I am not sure ]we would
get quorum, so I am going to cancel it.  Please let me know if ]there
was something important that we needed to discuss.
]
]   -Chas
]
]
]--
]Charles Dawson
]Senior Engineering Manager
]NC-Verilog Team
]Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
]270 Billerica Road
]Chelmsford, MA  01824
](978) 262 - 6273
]chas@cadence.com
]
]
]--
]This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
]MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
]
]
]--
]This message has been scanned for viruses and ]dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is ]believed to be clean.
]
]
]
]--
]This message has been scanned for viruses and ]dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is ]believed to be clean.
]
]
]

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.