Jason, the reason we haven't "just decided and implemented it" is that we've chosen to do other things first. As with our day jobs, we are working with limited resources. We are always looking for additional volunteers, so if you could find your way free to join us in the future, we'd be more than happy to have the extra help. And you could be free to add the proposal and shepherd it through the process. Unfortunately, at this point it's too late in the standardization cycle to get any more proposals into the next released version. But do consider joining us for the next round. Regards, Jim Vellenga --------------------------------------------------------- James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381 Software Architect (FAX) 978-262-6636 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com 270 Billerica Rd Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 "We all work with partial information." ---------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Jason Campbell Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 6:09 PM To: sv-cc@eda.org Subject: [sv-cc] Mantis 1434 Hi, This item is about why the join type isn't handled in the VPI interface. I was wondering why this is still open. It's been over 2 years with no activity. It seems like the proposed solution would work. Why not just decide and implement it? Thanks, Jason Campbell WinterLogic Inc. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Aug 26 05:27:56 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 26 2008 - 05:28:19 PDT