RE: [sv-cc] Mantis 1775 proposal replaced

From: Chuck Berking <berking_at_.....>
Date: Wed Jan 28 2009 - 13:34:37 PST
Correct- thanks Jim!


________________________________

	From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:jvellenga@verizon.net] 
	Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:33 PM
	To: Chuck Berking
	Cc: SV-CC; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
	Subject: Re: [sv-cc] Mantis 1775 proposal replaced
	
	
	This looks better, thanks.
	
	If I remember correctly, the reason for having a separate
#define SVPI_TYPES
	was so that the #ifdef PLI_TYPES section could be the same as
for
	the deprecated header files.  That being so, I approve the
revision
	that Chuck submitted today.
	
	Regards,
	Jim Vellenga
	
	
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
	Jim Vellenga (jvellenga@alum.mit.edu)
	Senior software engineer for team-based development; skilled at
team-
	building while retaining a detailed technical knowledge of the
project 
	itself.  Excellent at negotiating clear definitions (standards, 
	interfaces, etc.) across functional and industry boundaries.
	781-646-6778
	
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


	Chuck Berking wrote: 

		All-
		As per our meeting discussions today, I have completed
the corrections
		to the proposal I uploaded this morning- now replaced
also in Mantis
		(see attached).  I believe it is ready for the email
vote, so please do
		so soonest so we can wrap this up.
		Thanks,
		Chuck 
		
		  
		
________________________________


		This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security
Gateway. http://www.astaro.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Jan 28 13:36:41 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 28 2009 - 13:36:49 PST