Re: [sv-cc] Call for email vote on Mantis Item 1775

From: Charlie Dawson <chas_at_.....>
Date: Tue Feb 17 2009 - 07:51:30 PST
Hi All,

It was decided at the last P1800 meeting to allow Item 1775 to be a
ballot comment.  Please feel free to add it to your ballot comments.

   -Chas



Chuck Berking wrote:
> Jim- re. (2)
> You are correct- these should show p_vpi_arrayvalue instead of
> s_vpi_arrayvalue, and they are not covered by a Mantis item yet.  The
> argument *descriptions* are correct, but inconsistent with the type as
> shown.  I will post a Mantis item for this.
> Thanks,
> Chuck  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Jim
> Vellenga
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 4:55 PM
> To: Charlie Dawson
> Cc: SV-CC
> Subject: Re: [sv-cc] Call for email vote on Mantis Item 1775
> 
> Sorry that it's taken me so long to respond.  This job hunting business
> is time-consuming.
> 
> (1) I vote yes on the proposal as of today for Mantis Item 1775.
> 
> (2) But to check out Chuck's latest additions, I looked up
> vpi_get_value_array() and vpi_put_value_array() in draft8-preliminary.
> The argument tables look wrong in both.  I believe that the type of the
> second argument in each case should be p_vpi_arrayvalue rather than
> s_vpi_arrayvalue in each case, right?  And the table entry separators
> for the remaining arguments are extending too far to the left.  Is this
> being taken care of either editorially or by another Mantis Item
> already?
> 
> Regards,
> Jim Vellenga
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jim Vellenga (jvellenga@alum.mit.edu)
> Senior software engineer for team-based development; skilled at team-
> building while retaining a detailed technical knowledge of the project
> itself.  Excellent at negotiating clear definitions (standards,
> interfaces, etc.) across functional and industry boundaries.
> 781-646-6778
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Charlie Dawson wrote:
> 
>>Hi All,
>>
>>Please respond to the email with Yes, No, or Abstain on Item 1775.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>  -Chas
>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Charles Dawson
Senior Engineering Manager
NC-Verilog Team
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
270 Billerica Road
Chelmsford, MA  01824
(978) 262 - 6273
chas@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Feb 17 07:52:28 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 17 2009 - 07:52:32 PST