RE: [sv-cc] Mantis 2468 values needed

hi all,
I agree with the suggested numbers (661 through 664).
 
It doesn't really bother me that the 'generic' properties aren't
generic. Better to start small.
Abi


________________________________

From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Berking
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:03 PM
To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
Cc: SV-CC
Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Mantis 2468 values needed


I believe 661 -> 664 are available.  660 was vpiObjId- which, to my
knowledge, was the last new property added via Mantis 2572.
 
I know it's too late for this, but...
Looking at this, I wish we had given this a bit more thought (we do have
vpiLineNo as Shalom mentioned).  I.e. now we have 4 new  "generic"
source-location properties that apply only to assertions, which doesn't
seem to make much sense.  Oh well...
-CB


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Stuart Sutherland
	Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:52 PM
	To: sv-cc@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-cc] Mantis 2468 values needed
	
	

	Mantis 2468 requires the editor to select values for several
#define macros.  In order to avoid the risk of my picking invalid values
and causing yet another round of balloting, I would prefer that the CC
committee select the values.  Since the Mantis item was approved with
the values to be chosen later, these values can be added as a bug note
to Mantis 2468 without having to go through committee or champions
voting.  Just let me know when the bug note has been added.

	 

	Stu

	~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

	Stuart Sutherland

	stuart@sutherland-hdl.com

	(503) 692-0898

	 


	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.