As I look at Mantis item 2582, it does appear that the SV-CC has not approved the correction, although I believe that 2582 is connected with ballot comment 159 rather than 171. In addition, the change has not propagated to draft 9 preliminary. The proposal for Mantis item 2588, which corresponds to ballot comment 159, does appear to have been incorporated in the latest draft 9 preliminary. Regards, Jim Vellenga ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Jim Vellenga (jvellenga@alum.mit.edu) Senior software engineer for high-complexity software development in a production environment; skilled at team-building while retaining a detailed technical knowledge of the project itself. Excellent at negotiating clear definitions (standards, interfaces, etc.) across functional and industry boundaries. 781-646-6778 --- http://www.jimvellenga.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bresticker, Shalom wrote: > It appears that ballot comment 171 (Mantis 2582) has not yet had its > proposal approved by SV-CC. Please check urgently. > > Thanks, > Shalom > > Shalom Bresticker > Intel LAD DA > Jerusalem, Israel > +972 2 589 6582 (office) > +972 54 721 1033 (cell) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Israel (74) Limited > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jul 16 07:23:07 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 16 2009 - 07:23:44 PDT