[sv-cc] RE: 3423

Argument binding by name is described in 13.5.4.

Shalom

From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Berking
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 10:23 PM
To: Francoise Martinolle
Cc: sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-cc] RE: 3423

No I haven't. I was not aware you could use named connections with tasks & functions, assuming that is what you mean by "named argument binding" (aren't these arguments rather than ports ?).

In any case, I know of no "instance array" counterpart for task and function calls. [ And this is not a suggestion for another committee to take this up :-) ]
- CB

Chuck Berking | Member of Consulting Staff | Cadence

P: 978.262.6522 M: 603.253.9130 www.cadence.com<http://www.cadence.com/>

________________________________
From: Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 12:58 PM
To: Chuck Berking
Cc: sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: 3423
Chuck,

I forgot to bring this up at the meeting. Have you considered using this modeling of dotstar and dotnamed
connections for other places in SV where we can use and named connections.
For example function and task calls allow a mixture of positional and named argument binding
(positional arguments have to be given first).

Francoise
       '

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.