Re: [sv-cc] RE: Please vote on Mantis 3118

Hi Jim,

You are correct. The proposal should be updated to conform with the
coloring conventions that we normally use. Red strikeouts for text
being removed and blue for new text. The underlining for the new
text should also be removed. As you say, all proposals should have
the mantis item clearly shown at the top of the proposal.

Neil

On 03/31/11 06:02, Jim Vellenga wrote:
> Does it matter that the PDF proposal doesn’t red-line the deletion (it
> appears in blue instead) and doesn’t use the “REPLACE ... WITH” convention?
>
>
>
> Also the Mantis item number does not appear in the title.
>
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Bresticker, Shalom
> *Sent:* Thursday, 31 Mar 2011 4:29 AM
> *To:* sv-cc@eda.org
> *Subject:* [sv-cc] Please vote on Mantis 3118
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Shalom
>
>
>
> Shalom Bresticker
>
> Intel LAD DA, Jerusalem, Israel
>
> +972 2 589 6582 (office)
>
> +972 54 721 1033 (cell)
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/shalombresticker
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.