Hi Charles,
there is feedback from Shalom on this item and it was discussed in the BC meeting today.
Can you please put it on the agenda for next meeting.
The feedback from Shalom was that .name and .* are not defined by the LRM.
We discussed this in the BC meeting today and it looks like it is not trivial to describe
the semantics of .name and .* so the BC decided not to attempt to define this late in the
PAR. So we recommend the CC to remove detail 3 from proposal 3423 as it suggests that
this is legal in the LRM.
I have the action item to file a mantis item to track the clarification of .name and * usage
in array of instances. I will link 3423 to this new mantis item.
Francoise
'
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Nov 21 10:31:11 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 21 2011 - 10:31:23 PST