Thanks, Radek _____ From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:vellenga@cadence.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 2:34 PM To: Radoslaw Nawrot; sv-cc@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-cc] vpiTypeSpec or vpiTypespec typo Radek, absolutely right. I have added your e-mail report as a new Mantis item 4381. Thanks, Jim Vellenga From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Radoslaw Nawrot Sent: Wednesday, 19 Dec 2012 8:19 AM To: sv-cc@eda.org Subject: [sv-cc] vpiTypeSpec or vpiTypespec typo Hello , I found and typo in LRM 2009 37.15 Reference objects: 8) The vpiTypeSpec property returns NULL for a ref obj which vpiActual is a not a net, variable, or part select. 37.47 Property declaration: 2) The vpiTypeSpec relation shall return NULL if the formal is untyped. 37.49 Sequence declaration: 2) The vpiTypeSpec relation shall return NULL if the formal is untyped. I think that in all taht palces it should be vpiTypespec. And in 37.15 is should be relation not property. Am I right? Regards, Radek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Dec 19 05:45:39 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 19 2012 - 05:45:48 PST