RE: [sv-cc] vpiTypeSpec or vpiTypespec typo

From: Radoslaw Nawrot <Radoslaw.Nawrot@aldec.com.pl>
Date: Wed Dec 19 2012 - 05:44:38 PST
Thanks,
Radek

  _____  

From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:vellenga@cadence.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 2:34 PM
To: Radoslaw Nawrot; sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-cc] vpiTypeSpec or vpiTypespec typo



Radek, absolutely right.  I have added your e-mail report as a new Mantis
item 4381.

 

Thanks,

Jim Vellenga

 

From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Radoslaw
Nawrot
Sent: Wednesday, 19 Dec 2012 8:19 AM
To: sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-cc] vpiTypeSpec or vpiTypespec typo

 

Hello ,

I found and typo in LRM 2009

 

37.15 Reference objects:

8) The vpiTypeSpec property returns NULL for a ref obj which vpiActual is a
not a net, variable, or part select.

37.47 Property declaration:

2) The vpiTypeSpec relation shall return NULL if the formal is untyped.

 

37.49 Sequence declaration:

2) The vpiTypeSpec relation shall return NULL if the formal is untyped.

 

I think that in all taht palces it should be vpiTypespec. And in 37.15 is
should be relation not property. Am I right?

Regards,

Radek

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Dec 19 05:45:39 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 19 2012 - 05:45:48 PST