RE: [sv-cc] Callbacks on virtual interface var - proposal

From: Jim Vellenga <vellenga@cadence.com>
Date: Tue Sep 03 2013 - 05:46:42 PDT
A drawback of Shalom's proposal for using cbCreateObj and cbReclaimObj is that it doesn't cleanly identify the "object" associated with the virtual interface variable.  Presumably the interface being pointed to doesn't go in and out of existence as a class obj does.

Also, the fact that a class obj or interface object does not have a value doesn't prevent us from using a cbValueChange callback.  As noted in the description of the cbValueChange callback, the format field can also be set to vpiSuppressVal if "value information is not needed."  So I think that would be a more natural way of dealing with changes in valueless objects such as class objects and targets for virtual interface variables.

Regards,
Jim V.

From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 3:08 PM
To: Radoslaw Nawrot; 'Bresticker, Shalom'; sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Callbacks on virtual interface var - proposal

Hi Radoslaw,

I agree that we need to detect when a virtual interface variable  gets assigned a different interface instance or a virtual interface variable.
This is a simulation event that we should be able to track.
This is a little difficult since a value for a virtual interface variable is either an instance or another virtual interface. What is the value for an interface instance? VPI standard says that virtual interface variables and class variables do not have values. The detection of an event on a class variables is done with the callbacks you mentioned cbCreateObj and cbReclaimObj., but these callbacks to not apply very well to a virtual interface variable. A virtual interface variable is not a dynamic object, it will either be null or point to an instance of an interface that always exists. The virtual interface variable is statically elaborated (unless it is an automatic variable) so it will always have a defined value.
I think that the value needs to be defined by the VPI standard and that value needs somehow to represent an interface instance. Using value change callbacks should then be giving you what you need.

Francoise
        '

From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Radoslaw Nawrot
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 3:34 AM
To: 'Bresticker, Shalom'; sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Callbacks on virtual interface var - proposal

Thank you very much,

Radek
________________________________
From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 9:28 AM
To: Radoslaw Nawrot; sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Callbacks on virtual interface var - proposal
I submitted this as Mantis 4733.

From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Radoslaw Nawrot
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 14:26
To: sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-cc] Callbacks on virtual interface var - proposal

Hi All,
From 1800-2012 virtual interface is availble via VPI, but standard do not define any mechanizm to detect and handle initialization and disconnection of it

Is:
cbCreateObj After the class constructor call has completed and the internal state of a class object
has been initialized, or for shallow copy, after the copy operation has  completed.

cbReclaimObj Before the class object has been reclaimed by the automatic memory
management, when it has been marked as no longer being used. When control is
returned from this callback, any handles to this class object, its properties or their
subelements, and any associated callbacks should be considered invalid.

proposal:


cbCreateObj After the class constructor call has completed and the internal state of a class
object has been initialized, or for shallow copy, after the copy operation has  completed or
virtual interface has been initialized.

cbReclaimObj Before the class object has been reclaimed by the automatic memory
management, when it has been marked as no longer being used or virtual interface var
has been disconnected by null constant  or other interface instance. When control is
returned from this callback, any handles to this class object or virtual interface var ,
their properties or their subelements, and any associated callbacks should be considered invalid.

Regards,
Radek


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue, 3 Sep 2013 05:46:42 -0700

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 03 2013 - 05:47:59 PDT