Remove

From: Secasiu, Tudor <tudor.secasiu_at_.....>
Date: Wed Jan 03 2007 - 14:58:56 PST
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-verilog-ams@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Cameron
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 2:55 PM
To: verilog-ams@server.eda.org
Cc: Geoffrey.Coram
Subject: Re: Verilog-AMS Committee Meeting Minutes - Dec 22 2006

Geoffrey.Coram wrote:
> edaorg@v-ms.com wrote:
>   
>> IMO you should be able to describe your design without connecting any
>> ports and just wire it all up with OOMRs and it should behave the
same.
>>     
>
> If you did so, then wouldn't you have to have a separate module
> for every instance in the design?  Ports allow me to have a gate
> defined once but instantiated multiple times to connect different
> nets.  I guess it would behave the same, but that's an odd way
> to work.
>
> -Geoffrey
>   
I wasn't recommending it as a methodology :-)

Kev.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Jan 3 15:00:10 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 03 2007 - 15:00:13 PST